Which of the following is an effective assessment method for evaluating student progress?

The chosen method of observational assessments and performance reviews is effective for evaluating student progress because it allows instructors to gather a comprehensive understanding of a student's skills and knowledge in a real-world or practical context. This approach goes beyond static testing and provides insight into how students apply what they have learned in various situations, making it valuable for assessing not only technical abilities but also critical thinking, problem-solving, and interpersonal skills.

Observational assessments are particularly useful in environments where practical application is key, such as in sports coaching or teaching physical activities. It enables instructors to witness firsthand how students utilize their skills, interact with peers, and respond to challenges in real-time settings. Performance reviews further complement this by providing structured feedback based on clear criteria, which guides students on their progress and areas needing improvement.

The other methods lack the same level of efficacy for a few reasons. Relying solely on written exams limits assessment to knowledge retention and recall, which does not capture practical abilities or holistic development. Exclusively using group discussions overlooks individual contributions and may not adequately evaluate each student's understanding. Peer reviews that do not include instructor input can lead to subjective evaluations that may not accurately reflect a student’s true progress or learning. Thus, the blend of observational and performance-based assessments offers a robust framework